BibLaTeX with elsarticle


I like BibLaTeX and StackOverflow presents some ways reasons to switch to BibLaTeX. I like it, if nothing else, I can have multiple bibliographies easily. I can also use natbib citation style and also limit which fields are displayed in my bibliography. One problem with BibLaTeX is that it does not work well with Elsevier articles (class elsarticle), since natbib is loaded by default. There are some other options to induce compatibility are presented here and here.


So I edited the elsarticle.cls file to make it work. See the diff between the 2 files here:

diff elsarticle.cls elsarticle_nonatbib.cls
<  \def\RCSfile{elsarticle}%
>  \def\RCSfile{elsarticle_nonatbib}%
<  \def\@shortjid{elsarticle}
>  \def\@shortjid{elsarticle_nonatbib}
< \newcounter{author}
< \def\author{\@ifnextchar[{\@@author}{\@author}}
> \newcounter{auth}
> \def\auth{\@ifnextchar[{\@@auth}{\@auth}}
< \def\@@author[#1]#2{\g@addto@macro\elsauthors{%
> \def\@@auth[#1]#2{\g@addto@macro\elsauthors{%
< \def\@author#1{\g@addto@macro\elsauthors{\normalsize%
> \def\@auth#1{\g@addto@macro\elsauthors{\normalsize%
< \RequirePackage[\@biboptions]{natbib}
> %\RequirePackage[\@biboptions]{natbib}

If you've never read a diff output, the < means what's written in the first file (elsarticle.cls) and > means the second file (elsarticle_nonatbib.cls). The numbers correspond to the line in each file, e.g 192c193 means line 192 in file 1 and 193 in file 2.
Overall, I changed the type of article, commented out the natbib requirement, and changed the author field to auth (see below for why). The edited cls is located here.

Things you need to change

The \author field conflicts with biblatex and elsarticle, so you must chagne the \author definitions to \auth instead. This is a minor change, but important one. You can change that field to anything you want in the elsarticle_nonatbib.cls file (such as elsauthor).

Minimal Working Example (MWE)

I tried it with Elsevier's sample manuscript, changing the author fields to auth, and adding a biblatex-type heading:

  natbib = true,
    sortcites = true



at the end, and the manuscript came out as if using natbib. The MWE is located here and output PDF is located here.


You can use elsarticle with biblatex, with some minor changes. You may have to include this cls with the rest of your LaTeX files for them to compile on the editors machine. Maybe Elsevier will change the LaTeX for more flexibility, but the StackOverflow question was asked 3 years ago and not much seems to have changed, so I like my solution.


One thought on “BibLaTeX with elsarticle

  1. I’ve got few issues using your workaround:

    1. if other than ‘review’ options are chosen (i.e. 1p,3p or 5p) then there is a conflict with two definitions in elsarticle.cls:
    it seems that these lines can be simply commented.

    2. another thing is quite odd one – with renamed \author field to \auth or anything else there is no author list in the title of manuscript (i.e. empty line). I couldn’t find the reason for this behavior.

    so in the end, I found another approach to include biblatex package in elsarticle class. here is the important part of preamble:


    \expandafter\let\csname ver@natbib.sty\endcsname\relax

    \usepackage[… options …]{biblatex}

    hope it may help to somebody else.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s